Industry Report2026-05-1620 min Read
Chinese LLM Provider Comparison 2026
In-depth comparison of DeepSeek, Qwen, GLM, ERNIE, Doubao, Kimi, and MiniMax covering pricing, capabilities, and use cases.
ComparisonDeepSeekQwenGLMERNIEPricing
Market Overview
China's LLM market offers 200+ models at 80% lower costs than Western alternatives. Competition has driven rapid innovation.
Provider Comparison
| Provider | Best Model | Strength | Price Level | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek | R1, V3 | Reasoning | Low | Complex tasks |
| Alibaba | Qwen Max | Coding | Medium | Versatility |
| Zhipu | GLM-4 | Long context | Low | Document processing |
| Baidu | ERNIE 4.0 | Enterprise | High | Business apps |
| ByteDance | Doubao | Creative | Low | Content creation |
| Moonshot | K2.6 | Context | Medium | Long docs |
Cost Analysis
Flash models cost $0.0001-0.001 per 1K tokens. Premium models cost $0.5-2.0 per 1K tokens but offer better quality.
Selection Framework
- 推理/复杂任务: DeepSeek R1
- 代码: Qwen Coder Plus
- 长文档: Kimi K2.6
- 中文创意: Doubao
- 企业应用: ERNIE 4.0